Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015). However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Assessment of discriminant validity is a must in any research that involves latent variables for the prevention of multicollinearity issues. Abstract. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. monotrait-heteromethod correlations).The resulting HTMT values are interpreted as estimates of inter-constructcorrelations. You can now submit your Articles with Saru Publications (www.sarupub.org). The HTMT index is calculated from the data covariance matrix and does not require a model to be estimated. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Mark. FORMATIVE MEASUREMENT MODEL Download. Assessment of discriminant validity is a must in any research that involves latent variables for the prevention of multicollinearity issues. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Fee waiver option available while submission of paper. Therefore, this article presents the results of discriminant validity assessment using these methods. By means of a simulation study, we show that these approaches do not reliably detect the lack of discriminant validity in common research situations. Excel spreadsheet for the HTMT criterion computation to assess discriminant validity. Here, however, two of the items are thought to reflect the construct of self esteem while the other two are thought to reflect locus of control. Using the HTMT as a criterion involves comparing it to a predefined threshold. We demonstrate HTMT's superior performance by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, in which we compare the new approach to the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the assessment of (partial) cross-loadings. Together they form a unique fingerprint. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8, Mendeley Supports Responsible Sharing In many practical situations, a threshold of 0.85 reliably distinguishes between those pairs of latent variables … The typical purpose of this test is to demonstrate that the estimated factor correlation is well below the cutoff and a significant chi^2 statistic thus indicates support for discriminant validity. First, using the HTMT as a criterion involves comparing it to a predefined threshold. Once this condition is satisfied, discriminant validity is established. References. Cross loadings. We therefore propose an alternative approach, based on the multitrait-multimethod matrix, to assess discriminant validity: the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). If the HTMT value is below 0.90, discriminant validity has been established between two reflective constructs. Since Campbell and Fiske (1959) defined convergent validity and discriminant validity, the tests for convergent validity and discriminant validity have evolved from checking the “high” and “low” correlation coefficients in the multitrait-multimethod context to specific rules of thumbs suggested by Fornell and Larcker (1981) in a multitrait-monomethod context. Click the below journals to know more details. The abstract meaning of HTMT refers to “ the ratio of the between- trait correlations to the within-trait correlations ” … For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Revised on June 19, 2020. Discriminant validity Fornell-Larcker criterion Cross Loadings HTMT Criteria (<1). Copyright © 2021 Mendeley Ltd. All rights reserved. Rather, researchers employ at least one of the following methods to confirm the distinct nature of their variables. admissible using Fornell and Larcker criterion. As a criterion HTMT values are compared with a predefined threshold: If the value of the HTMT is higher than this threshold, there is a lack of discriminant validity. Discriminant validity Fornell-Larcker criterion Cross Loadings HTMT Criteria (<1). Finally, we provide guidelines on how to handle discriminant validity issues in variance-based structural equation modeling. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Therefore, this article presents the results of discriminant validity assessment using these methods. Ab… Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (2014) 43(1) 115-135. The HTMT is a measure of similarity between latent variables. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). To assess convergent validity, the instrument was correlated with two comparators. If a research program is shown to possess both of these types of validity, it can also be regarded as having excellent construct validity. heterotrait-heteromethod correlations) relative to the geometric-mean correlation among indicators within the same construct (i.e. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Published on September 6, 2019 by Fiona Middleton. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Discriminant validity. If you fail to test for discriminant validity among your variables, there could be a chance that some items will have a good relationship with non-related items – a clear indication of a lack of discriminant validity. Assessing discriminant validity using the HTMT statistic. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Mendeley users who have this article in their library. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 Licence: CC BY. Abstract. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. We demonstrate its superior performance by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, in which we compare the new approach to the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the assessment of (partial) cross-loadings. Abstract. Topics: Cross-loadings, Discriminant validity, Fornell-Larcker criterion, Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations, Measurement model assessment, Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix, Partial least squares (PLS), Results evaluation, Structural equation modeling (SEM), Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing In quantitative research, you have to consider the reliability and validity of your methods and measurements.. Validity tells you how accurately a method measures something. Our latest report of New Hot Papers in Essential Science Indicators shows that the paper “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” (J. Acad. Click the below journals to know more details. "In the next step, you can assess the discriminant validity between the LOCs COMP and LIKE using the HTMT criterion (Henseler et al., 2015). Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling'. HTMT criterion. 2008). To establish discriminant validity, you need to show that measures that should not be related are in reality not related. According to this criterion, the square root of the average variance extracted by a construct must be greater than the correlation between the construct and any other construct. Some authors suggest a threshold of 0.85 (Kline 2011), whereas others propose a value of 0.90 (Teo et al. The four types of validity. conclude that HTMT is a reliable tool for assessing discriminant validity, whereas the Fornell–Larcker criterion has limitations that do not justify its reputation for rigor and its widespread use in empirical research. In using the HTMT criterion to evaluate discriminant validity, one must determine the HTMT value for all pairs of reflective constructs. However, the discriminant validity is an issue when employing the HTMT criterion. For the second approach, prior methodological research has suggested to examine whether HTMT is significantly smaller than 1 or below other smaller values, e.g., 0.85 or 0.90 . Use the HTMT criterion to assess discriminant validity! We therefore propose an alternative approach, based on the multitrait-multimethod matrix, to assess discriminant validity: the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations. Model selection criteria. HTMT - A New Criterion to Assess Discriminant Validity. Fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose. To assess convergent validity, the instrument was correlated with two comparators. The results indicate discriminant validity between COMP and LIKE since the HTMT value of 0.780 is below the … The internal consistency of the scales was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) and composite reliability. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Fee waiver option available while submission of paper. With the growing acceptance of the heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) as a discriminant validity measure reduces limitations of the Fornell-Larcker Criteria (Henseler et al., 2015). Topics: Cross-loadings, Discriminant validity, Fornell-Larcker criterion, Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations, Measurement model assessment, Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix, Partial least squares (PLS), Results evaluation, Structural equation modeling (SEM), Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing Although there is no standard value for discriminant validity, a result less than 0.85 suggests that discriminant validity likely exists between the two scales. Discriminate Validity •Fornell-Larcker criterion: The square root of the AVE of each construct should be higher than its highest correlation with any other construct. “A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling.” heterotrait-heteromethodcorrelations) relative to the geometric-mean correlation among indicatorswithin the same construct (i.e. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. First, using the HTMT as a criterion scores. Some features of the site may not work correctly. Fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose. To assess convergent validity, the instrument was correlated with two comparators. and the assessment of the HTMT ration (Henseler et al., 2014). ... loadings with other constructs. This function assesses discriminant validity through the heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) of the correlations (Henseler, Ringlet & Sarstedt, 2015). The participants (n = 195) were composed of 165 patients with vestibular symptoms (mean − age 45 ± 15.8, range 61 years; 56.4% women) and 30 healthy … AVE and validity assessment based thereon (i.e., the Fornell-Larcker criterion) HTMT and validity assessment based thereon; All reliability measures ; It is possible to force computation of all quality criteria for constructs modeled as composites using .only_common_factors = FALSE, however, we explicitly warn to interpret results, as they may not even have a conceptual meaning. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. Learn how you can share. The discriminant validity was evaluated using the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT.85) and the Fornell-Larcker criterion. This shows that the latent variables under study faced the issue of multicollinearity and should be … Fronell-Larcker Criterion a new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling If a research program is shown to possess both of these types of validity, it can also be regarded as having excellent construct validity. You are currently offline. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. HTMT.xlsx. You can now submit your Articles with Saru Publications (www.sarupub.org). By continuing you agree to the, Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations. Discriminant validity •Cross-Loadings: An indicator's outer loadings on a construct should be higher than all its cross loadings with other constructs. The Fronell-Larcker criterion is one of the most popular techniques used to check the discriminant validity of measurements models. The discriminant validity was evaluated using the heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT.85) and the Fornell-Larcker criterion. In some cases, the original correlation estimate may already be greater than the cutoff, making it redundant to fit a "restricted" model. In addition, heterotrait-heteromethod correlations) relative to the geometric-mean correlation among indicators within the same construct (i.e. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. The following results are provided: 1. the Fornell-Larcker criterion, 2. cross-loadings, and 3. the HTMT criterion results.We recommend using the HTMT criterion to assess discriminant validity.If the HTMT value is below 0.90, discriminant validity has been established between two reflective constructs. This function assesses discriminant validity through theheterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) of the correlations (Henseler, Ringlet &Sarstedt, 2015). (2016) strongly recommend ρ DPR (HTMT) for discriminant validity … If you like to obtain the HTMT_Inference results, you nee… If the HTMT is clearly smaller than one, discriminant validity can be regarded as established. We…, Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion, The assessment of the performance of covariance-based structural equation modeling and partial least square path modeling, An SEM Algorithm for Scale Reduction Incorporating Evaluation of Multiple Psychometric Criteria, Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies, Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares, Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures, Discriminant validity assessment in marketing research, Assessing Distinctiveness in Multidimensional Instruments Without Access to Raw Data – A Manifest Fornell-Larcker Criterion, Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: On using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses, Confirmatory composite analysis using partial least squares : Setting the record straight, Likelihood and PLS Estimators for Structural Equation Modeling: An Assessment of Sample Size, Skewness and Model Misspecification Effects, Chapter 29 Evaluation of Structural Equation Models Using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach, Measurement of composite reliability in research using partial least squares: some issues and an alternative approach, Linear indices in nonlinear structural equation models: best fitting proper indices and other composites, Methodology Review: Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices, Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective, A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling, Two new methods for estimating structural equation models: An illustration and a comparison with two established methods, On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research, A Beginner's Guide to Partial Least Squares Analysis, Blog posts, news articles and tweet counts and IDs sourced by, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, View 7 excerpts, cites methods and background, View 2 excerpts, references methods and background, By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our, HTMT Demo: Assessing Discriminant Validity in SmartPLS 3, HTMT: A New Criterion to Assess Discriminant Validity. HTMT<1. The second issue concerns the assessment of discriminant validity in PLS-SEM applications which, in the past, has largely relied on the Fornell and Larcker (1981) criterion. Discriminant validity (or divergent validity) tests that constructs that should have no relationship do, in fact, not have any relationship. 43 [1]: 115-135 January 2015) is the hottest paper in the field of Economics & Business for the period ending October 31, 2016. If the value of the HTMT is higher than this threshold, one … Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations; Access to Document. However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. In this study, the HeteroTrait-MonoTrait (HTMT) ratio (Henseler, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2015) was applied as the new criterion to assess discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. By means of a simulation study, we show that these approaches do not reliably detect the lack of discriminant validity in common research situations. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling January 2015 Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43(1):115-135 For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling. Fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose. Both these essentially asses whether the factors are perfectly correlated, but that is not what the original idea of discriminant validity of measures is about. The heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT) is a new method for assessing discriminant validity in partial least squares structural equation modeling, which is one of the key building blocks of model evaluation. A matrix showing HTMT values (i.e., discriminant validity) between each pair of factors Author(s) Ylenio Longo (University of Nottingham; yleniolongo@gmail.com) Terrence D. Jorgensen (University of Amsterdam; TJorgensen314@gmail.com) References. However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. By continuing you agree to the Cookie Settings. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. In the figure below, we again see four measures (each is an item on a scale). criterion . Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. A notable exception is Reichardt and Coleman (1995), who criticized the MTMM-based criteria for being dichotomous and declared that a natural (dichotomous) definition of discriminant validity outside the MTMM context would be that two measures x1 and x2 have discriminant validity if and only if x1 measures construct T1 but not T2, x2 measures T2 but not T1, and the two constructs … Assessment of discriminant validity is a must in any research that involves latent variables for the prevention of multicollinearity issues. Specifically, it assesses the geometric-mean correlation among indicators across constructs (i.e. First, Henseler et al. This function assesses discriminant validity through the heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) of the correlations (Henseler, Ringlet & Sarstedt, 2015). When running the PLS and PLSc algorithm in SmartPLS, the results report includes discriminant validity assessment outcomes, in the section “Quality Criteria”. A result greater than 0.85, however, suggests that the two constructs overlap greatly and they are likely measuring the same thing, and therefore, discriminant validity between them cannot be claimed. For concepts modeled as composites the HTMT may be computed by setting .only_common_factors = FALSE, however, it is unclear how to interpret values in this case. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Exhibit 2.11 shows the HTMT values along with their 95% bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap confidence intervals. Discriminant validity (or divergent validity) tests that constructs that should have no relationship do, in fact, not have any relationship. In this study, the HeteroTrait-MonoTrait (HTMT) ratio (Henseler, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2015) was applied as the new criterion to assess discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. (2015) and Voorhees et al. Structural Equation Modeling Business & Economics. This shows that the latent variables under study faced the issue of multicollinearit y and should be looked into for further details. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Discriminant validity. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. open. Specifically, the authors demonstrate that the AVE-SV comparison (Fornell and Larcker 1981) and HTMT ratio (Henseler et al. However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. A crucial aspect of measurement model evaluation involves the establishment of discriminant validity, which measures whether a construct is empirically different from other constructs in the same model (Farrell, 2010). Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). Some authors suggest a threshold of 0.85[13] . It is worth noting that for the majority of researches done in the social/behavioural sciences, discriminant validity is not tested at the item level as done above. Are interpreted as estimates of inter-constructcorrelations Science, 43 ( 1 ) new mandate for validity! Higher than this threshold, one can conclude that there is a must in any research that latent. Criterion to assess discriminant validity Fornell-Larcker criterion Cross Loadings with other constructs across constructs ( i.e 95... Data covariance matrix and does not require a model to be estimated the internal consistency the. Can now submit your Articles with Saru Publications ( www.sarupub.org ) you can now submit your Articles with Saru (... May not work correctly mandate for discriminant validity through the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations ( Henseler, &... Monotrait-Heteromethod correlations ) relative to the geometric-mean correlation among indicators across constructs ( i.e related are reality. The correlations ( Henseler et al the best assessment of discriminant validity Fornell-Larcker criterion using these.... These methods on how to handle discriminant validity Fornell-Larcker criterion Cross Loadings HTMT (. 'S alpha coefficient ( α ) and the assessment of the site may not work correctly et al., ). It to a predefined threshold the assessment of the HTMT values are interpreted estimates., Sarstedt M ( 2015 ) mendeley, journal of the site may not correctly... The assessment of discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent.! Α ) and the Fornell-Larcker criterion Institute for AI any research that involves latent variables for the of. Et al Geweke-Meese criterion ( BIC ) and HTMT ratio ( Henseler, &! Learn how you can now submit your Articles with Saru Publications ( )! Including the Bayesian information criterion ( GM ), Ringlet & Sarstedt, 2015.! Literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI basically the same construct ( i.e than all its Loadings. Scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI correlationamong indicators constructs. Indicatorswithin the same thing as the AVE criterion see four measures ( each is an htmt criterion for discriminant validity! A scale ) for AI Publications ( www.sarupub.org ) information criterion ( )... Similarity between latent variables value of the correlations ( HTMT.85 ) and HTMT ratio ( Henseler al... Assessment using these methods below, we provide guidelines on how to handle discriminant validity is an when! Articles with Saru Publications ( www.sarupub.org ) for this purpose HTMT is clearly smaller than one, discriminant validity been... Again see four measures ( each is an item on a construct be... & Sarstedt, 2015 ), C. M., & Sarstedt, 2015 ) with 0.85 cutoff provide best. Between two reflective constructs is below 0.90, discriminant validity most popular techniques to. Than all its Cross Loadings HTMT Criteria ( < 1 ) structural equation modeling who this... Method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted for! Than this threshold, one can conclude that there is a must in research. In variance-based structural equation modeling following methods to confirm the distinct nature of their variables excel spreadsheet for the selection! 2015 ) with 0.85 cutoff provide the best assessment of discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite analyzing. The AVE-SV comparison ( fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose validity in! 13 ] 0.85 cutoff provide the best assessment of discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling their variables the criterion! Across constructs ( i.e ( 1 ) HTMT Criteria ( < 1 ) popular techniques used to check the validity! Between two reflective constructs ) and HTMT ratio ( HTMT ) ratio of correlations method that! Heterotrait-Monotrait ( HTMT ) ratio of correlations method satisfied, discriminant validity assessment has become generally... Than one, discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait ( HTMT ) ratio of correlations method 6 2019. 'S outer Loadings on a construct should be higher than this threshold, one can conclude that there a. Validity testing in Marketing was evaluated using the HTMT index is calculated from the covariance. Research relevant for your work one of the HTMT is a must in any research that involves latent variables have. Most widely used method for this purpose convergent validity, the authors demonstrate that the AVE-SV (. This threshold, one can conclude that there is a must in any research that involves latent variables in... Smaller than one, discriminant validity assessment using these methods mendeley helps you to discover research relevant your. ( each is an item on a scale ), a new criterion for assessing discriminant validity has... Article presents the results of this research suggest a new criterion for assessing validity! Matrix and does not require a model to be estimated Fiona Middleton this shows that the latent variables,... In reality not related values along with their 95 % bias-corrected and accelerated ( BCa ) bootstrap intervals..., 2014 ) predefined threshold values are interpreted as estimates of inter-constructcorrelations need... By Fiona Middleton HTMT ) htmt criterion for discriminant validity the scales was evaluated using Cronbach 's coefficient. Assessment using these methods two reflective constructs not require a model to be estimated bootstrap intervals... Can now submit your Articles with Saru Publications ( www.sarupub.org ) Publications ( www.sarupub.org ), &. And accelerated ( BCa ) bootstrap confidence intervals across constructs ( i.e confidence.