Revised on June 26, 2020. process, the elements of construct validity, internal validity, external validity and reliability is the strategy used to enhance the validity and reliability issue (Yin, 1994, 2009, 2012). The basic difference between these two criteria is that they deal with different aspects of measurement. Techniques used to establish reliability and validity in quantitative research are clear and well-established. On the other hand, the steps to obtaining trustworthiness in Reliability is easier to determine, because validity has more analysis just to know how valid a thing is. SUMMARY: 1. Validity and reliability in social science research 111 items can first be given as a test and, subsequently, on the second occasion, the odd items as the alternative form. There are particular steps to take when attempting internal validity, test -retest reliability, etc. Figure 12-2a the case in which there is a high degree of reliability and a low degree . Reliability and validity represent the effectiveness of the different methods applied in investigation. Thus in measurement, the two very important concepts are reliability - how consistent the outcome of the tool is, and validity – showing how well the Like reliability and validity as used in quantitative research are providing springboard to examine what these two terms mean in the qualitative research paradigm, triangulation as used in quantitative research to test the reliability and validity can also illuminate some ways to test or maximize the validity and reliability of a qualitative study. Validity and Reliability •Are necessary to ensure correct measurements of traits (not directly observable) •“Psychological measurement is the process of measuring various psychological traits. Published on July 3, 2019 by Fiona Middleton. Reliability vs validity: what’s the difference? This difference can be summarized by two different sets of questions asked when applying the two criteria: Reliability: a. Validity cannot exist without reliability and relevance, but reliability and relevance can exist independently of validity. Download Full PDF Package. Meticulous attention to these two aspects can make the difference between good research … There is a direct relationship between reliability and validity. Relationship of validity to reliability and relevance. Reliability and validity are concepts used to evaluate the quality of research. 3. 2.3 Triangulation in case study Triangulation is defined to be “a validity procedure where researchers search for … ... in turn, apply research results to the world to improve aspects Differences between reliability and validity When designing an experiment, both reliability and validity are important. 12-1. two fundamental criteria of measurement, i.e., reliability and validity. These are some of the differences between reliability and validity. depicts . Many of these steps can be completed by a couple clicks of a mouse. Figure . Validity ReliabilityR elevance Introduction | 341 They are basically two crucial parts of the research. 2. They indicate how well a method, technique or test measures something. With an unreliable experiment, results are untrustworthy. The corrected correlation coefficient between the even and odd item test scores will indicate the relative stability of … Validity and reliability are key aspects of all research. Reliability is more on the consistency of a measurement, while validity is focused more on how strong the outcome of the program was.